- Appoints blue eyed in a naive way.
- Regularized ‘Academic Arrangements’ appointed illegally.
- I want to clarify here that the scam is very big and so the news story will go in many parts, please read it continuously till its conclusion.
- The story regarding how the Director Technical Education, (Skill Development Department) ‘Tailors’ recommendations to accommodate the blue eyed is going on for last 4 days and today its fifth part.
jj correspondent
Jammu, Aug 11: Exposing the repeatedly misdeeds and malpractices in the Skill Development Department the then Technical Education department, which has not only cheated the then system but they have betrayed the law of land and also played the future of the students who were then part of the institutions. Let we continue and people may know the facts hiding in the files dumped in cupboards.
At S No. 32 in annexure to proposal is the name of Firdousa Akhter D/O Mohd Yousuf, Qualification B Sc and Designation Language Instructor. She was placed in ITI Anantnag. The required qualification for the post vide SRO 235, dated 17th April, 1979 is Degree with One year Teaching Experience but the Initial Appointment Order issued Vide No. 421 of 1995, dated 29-06-1995 shows the qualification as B Sc 2nd year. Why the illogical lack of similarity between the two official records on the same point? Further in the list of candidates working on the consolidated pay in adhoc arrangement against the Direct Quota posts having executed agreements in pursuance of the policy related to the adhoc appointments issued Vide Govt Order No 794- GAD of 2004, dated 22-05-2004 , the candidate is shown as Junior Instructor Electronics. The required qualification for the post is Matric and ITI pass in the Trade of Electronics. If the candidate was working on Academic Arrangement as per the proposal quoted above wherefrom does the technical qualification come? If it already existed at the time of submitting the proposal why it was not mentioned? And why a willful degradation from a post with higher grade to a one with lower grade? Why is change of cadre done here too? Regularised as Junior Instructor Electronics vide Order No 42- Edu (Tech) of 2018, dated 27-03-2018, against a post not mentioned in the Initial Appointment Order.
Whereas, at S No. 35 is Mehraju Din S/O Ahmad Din, with qualification Matric and work assigned Attendant. He was placed in ITI Anantnag. In the list of candidates working on consolidated pay in adhoc arrangement against the Direct Quota posts having executed agreements in pursuance of the policy related to the adhoc appointments issued vide Govt Order No 795- GAD of 2004, dated 22-05-2004, he is shown as Junior Instructor Carpentry on S No 23. The question is wherefrom does the technical qualification certificate of the NTC Carpentry come now? If it existed at the time of submission of proposal/or at the time of initial engagement, why it was not mentioned while preparing the list of the proposal? Leaving the option of Attendant and Carpentry Instructor, Vide Directorate Order No 686 of 2006, dated 21-08-2006 he is shown as Junior Assistant entitled to the consolidated pay equal to the minimum of the pay scale of Rs. 3050-4910 attached to the post of the Jr. Assistant and was placed in ITI Anantnag against the vacant post temporarily attached from ITI Tral. The qualification of NTC Carpentry is shown less here, rather it is concealed. The official documents are showing a discrepancy. In light of the information collected regarding the case, it comes to fore that Mehraju Din is the son of the same Ahmad Din who is retired Head Assistant of Technical Education and was in-service and very influential with the Directorate especially at the point of time of getting his son appointed in the department.
Meanwhile, on S No. 36 of annexure to proposal exists one Bilal Ahmad S /O Muzaffar Ahmad, qualification TDC and designation Social Studies Instructor? He was then placed in ITI Kulgam. The qualification required for the post is Graduate as per recruitment rules. So the claim made in the proposal regarding appointment as per norms and for the interest of the training program is just to hoodwink the concerned and help the beneficiary at the cost of snatching legal right of earning of someone against natural justice.
(To be continued)
