jj correspondent
Srinagar, Aug 9: As the Supreme Court is hearing a bunch of petitions challenging the abrogation of Article 370, Peoples Democratic Party (JKPDP) President Mehbooba Mufti on Wednesday hoped the apex judiciary’s verdict would meet the faith and aspirations of the people of J&K.
Mufti hoped that the Supreme Court will give a just and fair verdict in the case and that the people of Jammu and Kashmir will get justice.
“For me, this issue is not only about the legality and constitutionality but about the faith & aspirations of the people of J&K. It is also a matter that will decide whether the decision of ourleadership to disapprove the two nation theory and accede to a secular
& democratic India on the promise of safeguarding our identity and special status was right in the first place,” she told newspersons here.
Mufti claimed lawyers are “laying bare the patent illegality and unconstitutionality” of the abrogation of Article 370 in the Supreme Court of India and said the BJP-RSS dispensation will not be able to stifle the voices and arguments against the act in the Supreme Court.
She said that she and her party colleagues have been trying their best to give voice to the sentiments of the people of Jammu and Kashmir since the day the state was dismembered and its special status was snatched away.
However, they have had to face the brunt of the brute establishment that has been trying to muzzle the voices of dissent. she said
Mufti said it is being openly described in the Supreme Court how the then Governor self-appointed himself as the constituent assembly and his advisors assumed the role of the council of ministers.
She said that it is being widely expressed how, in absence of the concurrence from the actual constituent assembly of Jammu and Kashmir, the whole process carried out by the centre is patently illegal and unconstitutional. These are the things that Mufti said she and her party have been saying from day one.
Mufti said that she has not been to the Supreme Court of India to witness the proceedings because she would find it difficult to bear the arguments in favour of the illegal abrogation of the special status of Jammu and Kashmir. UNI
