A big fraud with Court!
- Now it is the time for Deputy Commissioner Jammu to step in this issue and hold an enquiry into this episode and book the then Patwari for cheating the Revenue department, Court and government beside seller and buyer who bought the illegal land.
- The land given to tiller under section 8 of Agrarian Reform Act 1976 cannot be sold by the person who has made first ‘Prospective Owner’ but Chuni sold the land, which should be immediately taken over by the government under section 28A of Agrarian Reform Act 1976.
- The Patwari has presented the false report by invoking inheritance clause, which is not applicable here and he made another white lie that Agrarian Reform Act 1976 has no applicability on this land, whereas Agrarian Reform Act 1976 has complete applicability.
JJ CORRESPONDENT
Jammu, Oct 22: How a Patwari can mislead the entire government system and even Court of Law? Why the Patwari has deliberately written in the Farad on point No 2 that it has been inherited to Chuni from his father Shivo Megh, when the land has been given to Chuni as a Prospective Owner under Agrarian Reform Act 1976 under section 8? Why the Patwari has made so big fraud and cheated the Revenue department, government and Court of Law? Why not the Girdawar, Naib Tehsidar has checked this fraud? Why the Patwari has gone so violate that he has written in point No 5 that Agrarian Reform Act 1976 section 8 has not impact on this Farad? These are some uncomfortable and tough questions for the Revenue department and Deputy Commissioner Jammu to answer so that people may repose the faith on the department.
The then government has made some reform in Agrarian laws and amended it under the name and style Agrarian Reform Act 1976 in which government has handed over the land to ‘Land to Tiller’ so that tillers may cultivate the land for their livelihood and the land was given to them under Agrarian Reform Act 1976 under section 8. In the same manner one Chuni son of Shivo Megh resident of Kote has been given land measuring 10 kanals and 6 marals under Khasra No 2314 for culti
In August 2010
vation and as per the act Chuni cannot send the land at any cost, if he would try to sell then the land can be the property of state vide Agrarian Reform Act 1976 under section 28A.
Now the intriguing part of the story is that the then Patwari who issued the Farad has openly cheated the Court of Law by presenting the false report regarding the land in question. If Chuni has been given land for cultivation under ‘Land to Tiller’ scheme then why the then corrupt Patwari has misrepresented the fact and evidently denied that Agrarian reform Act 1976 has no impact on this land.
The second fraud wreaked by the then patwari is that the land has been inherited to Chuni by his father Shivo Megh, which is white lie and big blunder. The said land measuring 10 kanal and 6 marlas under Khasra No 2314 had been given to Chuni under Agrarian Reform Act 1976 under section 8 and he cannot sell the land till his life. In case, if he want to sell then the land should go to state under section 28A Agrarian Reform Act 1976 but the Patwari has mocked on the system and the government. This is crystal clear that patwari, Girdwara and Naib Tehsildar are hand in glove and money has rolled through their hands.
